2021 European Cup tie-breaker: If the teams have the same points, how will the team decide

We have reached the critical moment of the 2021 European Cup group stage. The final round of the group stage will determine which 16 teams will advance to the knockout stage and which 8 teams will go home.

The teams that advance to the round of 16 will be: the top two of each of the six groups, plus the four best third.

If the teams have the same points, the group tiebreaker will play a role. The following are the deciding games of the 2021 European Cup. If two or more teams complete the game with the same total points, these deciding games will be used:

  1. Most points earned in matches between related teams
  2. Outstanding goal difference resulting from a match between related teams
  3. Related teams scored the most goals in the game
  4. Excellent goal difference in all group matches
  5. Most goals scored in all group matches
  6. Most won in all group matches
  7. Based only on the minimum total disciplinary points of yellow cards (1 point) and red cards (3 points) received in all group matches
  8. Position in the overall ranking of the European qualifiers

The tiebreaker is outlined in European Cup Official Game Rules Book page 17.

It should be noted that if more than two teams have the same score (such as a three-way or four-way tie), if the team still has a deadlock after applying the above-mentioned article 1-3 to the tiebreaker, then there is no. 1- 3 Reapplies to specific teams that are still in a tie, and only applies to matches between them. If this still does not break the tie, then numbers 4-8 will apply to the same team.

Considering the final day of the matchup, the only situation that could lead to a tie between the three involved Group B and Group E.

2021 European Cup group standings

Group A

team Temporary worker general practitioner width Rise D GF Genetic algorithm Guangdong
Italy-X 6 2 2 0 0 6 0 +6
Wales 4 2 1 0 1 3 1 +2
Switzerland 1 2 0 1 1 1 4 -3
Turkey 0 2 0 2 0 0 5 -5

Group B

team Temporary worker general practitioner width Rise D GF Genetic algorithm Guangdong
Belgium-X 6 2 2 0 0 5 1 +4
Russia 3 2 1 1 0 1 3 -2
Finland 3 2 1 1 0 1 1 0
Denmark 0 2 0 2 0 1 3 -2

Group C

team Temporary worker general practitioner width Rise D GF Genetic algorithm Guangdong
Netherlands-X 6 2 2 0 0 5 2 +3
Ukraine 3 2 1 1 0 4 4 0
Austria 3 2 1 1 0 3 3 0
North Macedonia 0 2 0 2 0 2 5 -3

Group D

team Temporary worker general practitioner width Rise D GF Genetic algorithm Guangdong
Czech Republic 4 2 1 0 1 3 1 +2
United Kingdom 4 2 1 0 1 1 0 +1
Croatia 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 -1
Scotland 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 -2

Group E

team Temporary worker general practitioner width Rise D GF Genetic algorithm Guangdong
Sweden 4 2 1 0 1 1 0 +1
Slovakia 3 2 1 1 0 2 2 0
Spain 2 2 0 0 2 1 1 0
Poland 1 2 0 1 1 2 3 -1

Group F

team Temporary worker general practitioner width Rise D GF Genetic algorithm Guangdong
France 4 2 1 0 1 2 1 +1
Germany 3 2 1 1 0 4 3 +1
Portugal 3 2 1 1 0 5 4 +1
Hungary 1 2 0 1 1 1 4 -3



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *